Nassau County tax insights

Where Nassau Assessment Reductions and Tax Increases Are Showing Up

Compare finalized Tax Year 2026/27 reduction patterns, 2026 tax levels, and 2022-2026 tax growth by city and school district.

Built from 330,405 Class 1 residential properties, assessment history, tax records, and comparable-evidence signals.

Interactive charts

Compare local patterns side by side

Switch between city and school-district views to see how reduction outcomes and tax pressure differ across Nassau.

Finalized 2025 appeal results · Tax Year 2026/27

How Nassau assessment reductions were distributed

The full bar represents all analyzed Class 1 residential properties. Gray shows no recorded reduction; the colored segments show reduction size.

44.0%
15.3%
32.8%
7.0%
No reduction: 44.0% · 145,285 properties
0-5%: 15.3% · 50,657 properties
5-10%: 32.8% · 108,214 properties
10-15%: 7.0% · 23,014 properties
15-20%: 0.8% · 2,471 properties
>20%: 0.2% · 764 properties

Local reduction distribution

Which school districts had the most recorded reductions

Each local area is shown as one 100% bar, making it easier to compare no-reduction share and reduction-size mix.

Area

Tax pressure

Average 2026 total tax by school district

Compare current tax levels or the pace of increase. Total tax stacks school tax and general tax when viewing 2026 averages.

Area

Metric

View

Average reduction by city

Recent assessment reductions by Nassau city or Census place

These areas are sorted by average assessment cut. The table starts with the top 10, with search and full-list access available when you need a specific place.

Check Your Home
Floral Park57.0%9.12%8.80%Check Your Home
Mineola56.3%8.34%8.26%Check Your Home
Rockville Centre68.1%7.60%7.67%Check Your Home
East Rockaway62.1%7.55%7.52%Check Your Home
New Hyde Park61.9%7.55%7.43%Check Your Home
Carle Place58.2%7.44%7.43%Check Your Home
Oceanside63.1%7.41%7.57%Check Your Home
East Norwich58.7%7.40%7.41%Check Your Home
Malverne60.8%7.35%7.28%Check Your Home
North Merrick67.0%7.35%7.34%Check Your Home

Average reduction by school district

Recent assessment reductions by Nassau school district

Nassau homeowners often think about taxes through school districts. These results are sorted by average assessment cut and folded to the top 10 by default.

Data note: Glen Cove is excluded from Nassau County comparison tables because school-tax billing and assessment records are maintained separately by the City of Glen Cove and are not fully available in the countywide data used for these comparisons.

What this means

Area averages are a starting point.

Area averages do not guarantee your result. Your home still needs its own review based on market value, similar homes, and recent sales.

Check My Address

Advanced data

Advanced signals for deeper review

Open this section for assessment spread, opportunity score, candidate rate, evidence readiness, remaining modeled opportunity, home-type signals, and tax growth.

Show advanced data

Advanced view

Apply one area view across every advanced section.

Where Assessments Look Least Consistent

The Nassau County assessment system is not perfectly even. In these areas, similar homes can sit far apart in the assessment model, which may mean some homeowners are carrying more than their fair share.

Start here if you want to know whether the system looks uneven near you.

Fairness check

Greenvale currently shows the widest assessment spread.

Similar local homes in this area show an assessment spread of 85.7%. Higher spread means comparable homes are farther apart in the assessment model.

Showing 71 of 71

Cities with widest assessment spread

These cities and Census places show the largest gap between lower-end and higher-end assessment positions among comparable local homes.

RankAreaPropertiesAssessment SpreadView
1Greenvale32785.7%Insights
2Oyster Bay1,97983.1%Insights
3Old Westbury79681.8%Insights
4North Bellmore58481.8%Insights
5Albertson2,08681.3%Insights
6North Massapequa13981.1%Insights
7Malverne2,74980.6%Insights
8Bethpage6,11680.5%Insights

Estimated savings are not guarantees. Actual outcomes depend on property-specific evidence and assessment review decisions.

Where Nassau Homeowners Are Leaving Money on the Table

Once you know the system looks uneven, the next question is money. This map shows where recent assessment reductions are concentrated, and the table ranks areas by the size and strength of the remaining appeal opportunity.

Millions of dollars in potential annual savings appear concentrated in specific cities and school districts.

Opportunity check

New Hyde Park ranks highest by combined opportunity score.

This area has 3,647 candidate homes and an estimated savings pool of $5,269,508.

2025 Assessment Reduction Share by City

Each shaded area shows the percentage of properties in that city or Census place that received an assessment reduction in the most recent finalized appeal cycle, filing year 2025.

Showing 71 of 71

All city opportunities ranked by combined score

Cities and Census places with enough source records are ranked by an opportunity score: 35% candidate rate, 30% total estimated savings pool, 20% average savings per candidate, and 15% comparable evidence availability. The score is a prioritization measure, not a probability.

RankOpportunity ScoreCityCandidate HomesTotal Est. SavingsAvg. Savings / CandidateCandidate RateView
131.67New Hyde Park3,647$5,269,508$1,45233.0%Insights
228.73Great Neck1,814$4,491,965$2,50823.1%Insights
328.57Hicksville3,943$4,004,189$1,01835.2%Insights
426.14Valley Stream3,998$3,434,997$86534.1%Insights
525.88Port Washington1,683$3,627,075$2,16224.2%Insights
625.66Floral Park2,020$2,320,802$1,15140.5%Insights
725Massapequa3,175$4,286,956$1,35620.8%Insights
823.94Franklin Square2,337$2,378,676$1,02135.8%Insights

Estimated savings are not guarantees. Actual outcomes depend on property-specific evidence and assessment review decisions.

Why an Appeal Matters Now

School and general taxes are rising fast. If the base assessment is wrong, every new tax increase can make that mistake more expensive.

Use this section to see where tax pressure has grown fastest.

Urgency check

Island Park shows the fastest school-tax growth in this view.

Average school tax growth is 38.1%, compared with general tax growth of 3.94%.

Showing 71 of 71

Cities ranked by school tax growth

Cities and Census places with enough source records are ranked by average school tax growth from 2022 through 2026.

RankCityPropertiesSchool Tax GrowthGeneral Tax GrowthSchool vs General GapView
1Island Park1,95238.1%3.9%34.1%Insights
2Jericho2,76520.4%12.4%8.0%Insights
3Uniondale5,01819.1%6.4%12.7%Insights
4Sea Cliff1,51218.4%7.9%10.5%Insights
5Woodbury1,42617.2%11.2%5.9%Insights
6Port Washington6,94515.0%-2.6%17.6%Insights
7Great Neck7,87014.1%-2.8%16.9%Insights
8Plainview8,23714.0%8.4%5.6%Insights

Estimated savings are not guarantees. Actual outcomes depend on property-specific evidence and assessment review decisions.

It Pays to Fight Back

Winning is possible when the evidence supports it. Historical reductions reflect results from the most recent appeal filing year with finalized outcomes: 2025. They are not guarantees; every property still requires its own review.

This section shows where homeowners recently succeeded in cutting assessments.

Proof check

Floral Park led this view for recent assessment cuts.

The average recorded assessment cut was 9.12% in the most recent finalized filing year.

Showing 71 of 71

Cities ranked by historical assessment cuts

These cities and Census places are ranked by average assessment reductions recorded in the most recent finalized appeal filing year, 2025.

RankCityProperties ReducedAvg. Assessment CutMedian Assessment CutView
1Floral Park2,8429.1%8.8%Insights
2Mineola2,4858.3%8.3%Insights
3Rockville Centre4,2887.6%7.7%Insights
4East Rockaway1,8627.6%7.5%Insights
5New Hyde Park6,8407.6%7.4%Insights
6Carle Place7257.4%7.4%Insights
7Oceanside5,2967.4%7.6%Insights
8East Norwich4977.4%7.4%Insights

Estimated savings are not guarantees. Actual outcomes depend on property-specific evidence and assessment review decisions.

Recent Wins May Still Leave Money Behind

A 2025 reduction is a good sign, but it does not always mean the assessment is now fully supported. This section subtracts the prior assessment cut from the model's total potential reduction signal, then shows where a positive remaining signal may still exist.

Areas near the top show visible recent appeal success plus additional modeled remaining opportunity after accounting for the prior cut.

Still worth checking

Old Bethpage shows recent wins and remaining modeled opportunity.

Reduced properties in this area averaged a 6.86% recent assessment cut. After subtracting that prior cut from the model's total potential reduction signal, the average remaining signal is 1.25%.

Showing 71 of 71

Cities where recent wins may not have closed the gap

These cities and Census places compare average 2025 assessment cuts with the model's remaining reduction signal among properties that already received a recent reduction.

RankRemaining OpportunityCityRecently ReducedRecent Win ShareAvg. Recent CutAvg. Modeled PotentialAvg. Remaining SignalPositive Remaining ShareView
141.36Old Bethpage1,12176.5%6.9%6.7%1.3%44.4%Insights
241.02Plainview5,94772.2%6.5%6.6%1.4%49%Insights
340.12Merrick6,49568.7%6.9%6.9%1.4%48.8%Insights
440.04Wantagh6,54468.7%6.9%6.9%1.3%48.5%Insights
539.98Woodbury99469.7%5.6%5.6%1.4%46.8%Insights
639.97Rockville Centre4,28868.1%7.6%7.4%1.7%48.0%Insights
739.89Woodmere2,29165.0%6.0%6.2%1.6%52.8%Insights
839.45Jericho2,03073.4%7.3%6.5%1.3%36.9%Insights

Estimated savings are not guarantees. Actual outcomes depend on property-specific evidence and assessment review decisions.

Can the Review Be Backed by Evidence?

A strong appeal needs more than frustration. It needs comparable homes, recent sales, and a clear argument that the assessment is not well supported.

This section shows where comparable evidence is already strongest for property-level review.

Evidence check

Levittown has the strongest comparable-evidence score in this view.

Its evidence readiness score is 77.7, based on equity comps, sales comps, and top equity match quality.

Showing 71 of 71

Cities where comparable evidence is strongest

These cities and Census places are ranked by the availability and strength of comparable evidence. The score combines equity comparable count, sales comparable count, and top equity match quality.

RankCityEquity CompsSales CompsTop Equity MatchEvidence ReadinessView
1Levittown9.9590.6%77.73Insights
2Williston Park9.9588.2%77.24Insights
3East Meadow9.9588.0%77.2Insights
4Franklin Square9.9587.6%77.13Insights
5North Massapequa9.9587.6%77.12Insights
6Massapequa Park9.9587.2%77.04Insights
7Mineola9.8588.3%76.86Insights
8Plainview9.8588.2%76.83Insights

Estimated savings are not guarantees. Actual outcomes depend on property-specific evidence and assessment review decisions.

Which Home Types May Deserve a Closer Look?

Some combinations of home style and build era show stronger appeal opportunity than others. This is not a verdict on any one property, but it can help homeowners decide whether a closer review is worthwhile.

Some style and era combinations show a higher concentration of reduction probability, savings, and historical assessment cuts.

Style and build-era signals

Each card groups homes by architectural style and build era. The opportunity score combines the modeled appeal signal, average estimated savings, median equity position, and historical reduction rate for that group.

SPLIT LEVEL

Built 2000 or later

92 properties

Score
37.8
Modeled appeal signal: 6.5%
Avg. estimated savings: $2,347

MANSION, ESTATE

Built pre-1940

81 properties

Score
37.2
Modeled appeal signal: 4.8%
Avg. estimated savings: $6,123

MANSION, ESTATE

Built 2000 or later

140 properties

Score
36.1
Modeled appeal signal: 5.1%
Avg. estimated savings: $6,096

RANCH

Built 2000 or later

225 properties

Score
35.7
Modeled appeal signal: 6.7%
Avg. estimated savings: $1,746

CAPE

Built 2000 or later

225 properties

Score
33.7
Modeled appeal signal: 6.8%
Avg. estimated savings: $1,460

MODIFIED RANCH

Built 1980-1999

79 properties

Score
33.4
Modeled appeal signal: 6.1%
Avg. estimated savings: $1,562

SPLANCH

Built 1980-1999

172 properties

Score
33.1
Modeled appeal signal: 6.6%
Avg. estimated savings: $1,345

COLONIAL

Built 2000 or later

12,308 properties

Score
32.7
Modeled appeal signal: 6.5%
Avg. estimated savings: $1,986

SPLIT LEVEL

Built 1980-1999

69 properties

Score
32.6
Modeled appeal signal: 6.2%
Avg. estimated savings: $1,195

CAPE

Built 1980-1999

342 properties

Score
32.4
Modeled appeal signal: 6.2%
Avg. estimated savings: $1,375

COLONIAL

Built 1980-1999

4,650 properties

Score
31.4
Modeled appeal signal: 6.4%
Avg. estimated savings: $1,505

MODIFIED RANCH

Built 1960-1979

602 properties

Score
30.5
Modeled appeal signal: 6.4%
Avg. estimated savings: $1,329

Tudor

Built pre-1940

566 properties

Score
30.4
Modeled appeal signal: 7.0%
Avg. estimated savings: $1,300

SPLIT LEVEL

Built pre-1940

67 properties

Score
30.4
Modeled appeal signal: 6.4%
Avg. estimated savings: $1,086

CARRIAGE HOUSE

Built pre-1940

61 properties

Score
30.1
Modeled appeal signal: 5.9%
Avg. estimated savings: $2,219

DUPLEX OR TRIPLEX

Built 2000 or later

261 properties

Score
30.0
Modeled appeal signal: 6.8%
Avg. estimated savings: $1,352

RAISED RANCH/HI RANC

Built 2000 or later

515 properties

Score
29.9
Modeled appeal signal: 6.2%
Avg. estimated savings: $967

SPLANCH

Built 1960-1979

3,609 properties

Score
29.6
Modeled appeal signal: 6.5%
Avg. estimated savings: $1,295

SPLIT LEVEL

Built 1960-1979

4,019 properties

Score
29.5
Modeled appeal signal: 6.6%
Avg. estimated savings: $1,182

DUPLEX OR TRIPLEX

Built 1980-1999

453 properties

Score
29.3
Modeled appeal signal: 6.6%
Avg. estimated savings: $1,004

Estimated savings are not guarantees. Actual outcomes depend on property-specific evidence and assessment review decisions.

How FairValue organizes the signal

Countywide patterns are useful for context. A property-level audit narrows the same data into evidence for one home.

Market value comparison

Peer equity review

Comparable sales review

Historical reduction patterns

Evidence readiness scoring

Find out exactly how much you could save.

We have done the math for Nassau County. Now, let us look at your specific home. Enter your address to see if your assessment may be due for a reduction.

Important note

FairValue Tax provides data-driven informational guidance for Nassau County property assessment review. Estimated savings and assessment signals assessment signals are not guarantees. Final outcomes depend on property-specific evidence, exemptions, applicable assessment rules, and review decisions by the appropriate assessment authority.