Properties analyzed
7,182
Local residential properties included in this analysis.
Local property tax insight
Recent appeal results show what happened in the Franklin Square Union Free School District. See the local pattern, then check whether your own assessment may deserve a closer review.
Check My PropertyRecent results in Franklin Square Union Free School District
Properties analyzed
Local residential properties included in this analysis.
Properties reduced
Homeowners whose properties had a finalized assessment reduction in this school district.
Received a reduction
Share of analyzed properties with a recorded reduction.
No reduction
Share of analyzed properties without a recorded reduction.
Typical reduction
Median assessment reduction among properties that received one.
Based on finalized 2025 appeal results for properties analyzed in the Franklin Square Union Free School District. Past results do not guarantee a future reduction.
What this means for your home
Local results show that assessment reductions have been visible in the Franklin Square Union Free School District. However, neighborhood or district averages cannot determine whether your individual assessment is fair.
Your property should be reviewed based on its assessed value, similar nearby homes, relevant recent sales, assessment history, and property-specific conditions.
About 1 in 3 analyzed homes still showed a stronger review signal.
Check your property
The initial property analysis is complimentary.
Local tax trend
The growth rate is usually easier to read than raw dollar lines. The latest average dollar amounts are shown for context.
School Tax change
From 2022 to 2026; latest average bill: $6,564.
General Tax change
From 2022 to 2026; latest average bill: $5,598.
This shows how quickly average school and general tax bills have changed since 2022. Faster growth can be a useful prompt to check whether the current assessment is still well supported.
Communities in this school district
How we evaluate your home
Step 1
Compare your assessment with similar nearby homes.
Step 2
Review relevant recent home sales.
Step 3
Identify property details that may affect value.
These statistics summarize historical local results and data-based review signals. They are not predictions or guarantees. Every property requires an individual review, and final outcomes depend on available evidence and the decision of the appropriate assessment authority.
Advanced analytics
These indicators are useful for deeper review, but they are not needed to answer the basic homeowner question of whether your own address deserves a closer look.
Residential properties included in this local analysis.
Properties with at least a 70% modeled reduction probability and no recent reduction already recorded.
High-probability candidates divided by total properties analyzed.
Estimated annual savings across high-probability candidates.
Average estimated annual savings among high-probability candidates only.
Average number of similar peer properties available for assessment-equity comparison.
Average number of comparable sales available for market evidence.
Average school tax growth from 2022 through 2026.
This starts with the practical question: how many Franklin Square Union Free School District homes appear likely to benefit from a closer review, and how much annual savings might be at stake if the evidence supports a reduction?
The strongest local opportunity comes from properties with high modeled reduction probability and no visible deducted assessment flag.
| Properties | High-Probability Homes | Estimated Savings | Avg. / Candidate | Candidate Rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 7,182 | 2,438 | $4,574,820 | $1,876 | 34.0% |
Estimated savings are not guarantees. Actual outcomes depend on property-specific evidence and assessment review decisions.
Each property is first assigned an equity position percentile by comparing it with its own similar homes. Then all properties in this area are sorted from low to high by that percentile. The P10, P25, median, P75, and P90 values summarize that sorted list, so P10 means 10% of local properties fall at or below that equity position. Lower values mean properties look more favorably assessed; higher values mean properties look less favorably assessed.
A wider spread means local homes show more uneven assessment positions relative to peers.
10% of properties are at or below this equity position among comparable homes.
25% of properties are at or below this equity position among comparable homes.
Half of properties are below this equity position and half are above it.
75% of properties are at or below this equity position among comparable homes.
90% of properties are at or below this equity position among comparable homes.
Gap between the low-end and high-end equity positions. Higher means assessments look less consistent.
Estimated savings are not guarantees. Actual outcomes depend on property-specific evidence and assessment review decisions.
Comparable evidence readiness estimates how much supporting evidence is available in this area for a property-level review. It combines the number of peer equity comps, the number of sales comps, and the quality of the best equity comparable match.
Higher comparable counts and stronger sales scores can make review screening more evidence-ready.
Average number of similar peer properties available for assessment-equity comparison.
Average number of comparable sales available for market-value evidence.
Average quality score of the best equity comparable match. Higher means the closest peer comps look more similar.
Combined score: up to 40 points from equity comps, 40 from sales comps, and 20 from top equity match quality.
Estimated savings are not guarantees. Actual outcomes depend on property-specific evidence and assessment review decisions.
This ranks local style and build-era combinations with stronger modeled review signals.
These combinations show stronger local probability, savings, or peer equity signals than other local property types.
Each card groups homes by architectural style and build era. The opportunity score combines median reduction probability, average estimated savings, median equity position, and historical reduction rate for that group.
Built 1980-1999
10 properties
Built 2000 or later
135 properties
Built 2000 or later
17 properties
Built 1960-1979
29 properties
Built 1980-1999
68 properties
Built 1980-1999
76 properties
Built 1960-1979
26 properties
Built 1960-1979
80 properties
Built 1940-1959
36 properties
Built 1940-1959
295 properties
Estimated savings are not guarantees. Actual outcomes depend on property-specific evidence and assessment review decisions.
Historical reductions reflect results from the most recent appeal filing year with finalized outcomes: 2025. These results can show whether reductions have been visible locally, but they do not guarantee any future outcome.
Historical reductions are informational signals and do not determine future review outcomes.
| Properties Reduced | Avg. Assessment Cut | Median Assessment Cut |
|---|---|---|
| 4,327 | 10.8% | 10.4% |
Estimated savings are not guarantees. Actual outcomes depend on property-specific evidence and assessment review decisions.