Properties analyzed
163
Local residential properties included in this analysis.
Local property tax insight
Could Your Mill Neck Home Be Over-Assessed?
Recent appeal results show what happened in Mill Neck. See the local pattern, then check whether your own assessment may deserve a closer review.
Check My PropertyRecent results in Mill Neck
What happened locally in finalized 2025 appeals
Properties reduced
101
Homeowners whose properties had a finalized assessment reduction in this community.
Received a reduction
62.0%
Share of analyzed properties with a recorded reduction.
No reduction
38.0%
Share of analyzed properties without a recorded reduction.
Typical reduction
14.2%
Median assessment reduction among properties that received one.
Based on finalized 2025 appeal results for properties analyzed in Mill Neck. Past results do not guarantee a future reduction.
What this means for your home
Local results are useful, but your property needs its own review.
Local results show that assessment reductions have been visible in Mill Neck. However, neighborhood or district averages cannot determine whether your individual assessment is fair.
Your property should be reviewed based on its assessed value, similar nearby homes, relevant recent sales, assessment history, and property-specific conditions.
About 1 in 5 analyzed homes still showed a stronger review signal.
Check your property
Find out whether your home appears over-assessed.
- Review your current county assessment
- Compare similar nearby homes
- Review relevant recent sales
- Look for local assessment patterns
- Consider property-specific factors
The initial property analysis is complimentary.
Local tax trend
How average local tax bills have changed since 2022
The growth rate is usually easier to read than raw dollar lines. The latest average dollar amounts are shown for context.
School Tax change
7.87%
From 2022 to 2026; latest average bill: $30,781.
General Tax change
-7.18%
From 2022 to 2026; latest average bill: $6,051.
Average tax bill change since 2022
This shows how quickly average school and general tax bills have changed since 2022. Faster growth can be a useful prompt to check whether the current assessment is still well supported.
School districts serving this area
Explore nearby local insights
How we evaluate your home
A property-specific review looks beyond area averages.
Step 1
Compare your assessment with similar nearby homes.
Step 2
Review relevant recent home sales.
Step 3
Identify property details that may affect value.
Important Information
These statistics summarize historical local results and data-based review signals. They are not predictions or guarantees. Every property requires an individual review, and final outcomes depend on available evidence and the decision of the appropriate assessment authority.
Advanced analytics
Open the deeper assessment, savings, evidence, and tax signals
These indicators are useful for deeper review, but they are not needed to answer the basic homeowner question of whether your own address deserves a closer look.
View
Advanced analytics
Open the deeper assessment, savings, evidence, and tax signals
These indicators are useful for deeper review, but they are not needed to answer the basic homeowner question of whether your own address deserves a closer look.
Total properties analyzed
163
Residential properties included in this local analysis.
High-probability candidates
31
Properties with at least a 70% modeled reduction probability and no recent reduction already recorded.
Candidate rate
19.0%
High-probability candidates divided by total properties analyzed.
Estimated savings
$247.8K
Estimated annual savings across high-probability candidates.
Average savings
$8K
Average estimated annual savings among high-probability candidates only.
Average equity comps
7.9
Average number of similar peer properties available for assessment-equity comparison.
Average sales comps
0.4
Average number of comparable sales available for market evidence.
School tax growth
7.9%
Average school tax growth from 2022 through 2026.
Where the city savings signal comes from
This starts with the practical question: how many Mill Neck homes appear likely to benefit from a closer review, and how much annual savings might be at stake if the evidence supports a reduction?
The strongest local opportunity comes from properties with high modeled reduction probability and no visible deducted assessment flag.
| Properties | High-Probability Homes | Estimated Savings | Avg. / Candidate | Candidate Rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 163 | 31 | $247,751 | $7,992 | 19.0% |
Estimated savings are not guarantees. Actual outcomes depend on property-specific evidence and assessment review decisions.
Do similar homes look evenly assessed?
Each property is first assigned an equity position percentile by comparing it with its own similar homes. Then all properties in this area are sorted from low to high by that percentile. The P10, P25, median, P75, and P90 values summarize that sorted list, so P10 means 10% of local properties fall at or below that equity position. Lower values mean properties look more favorably assessed; higher values mean properties look less favorably assessed.
A wider spread means local homes show more uneven assessment positions relative to peers.
Low-end equity position
19.7%
10% of properties are at or below this equity position among comparable homes.
Lower-quarter equity position
42.9%
25% of properties are at or below this equity position among comparable homes.
Typical equity position
71.4%
Half of properties are below this equity position and half are above it.
Upper-quarter equity position
91%
75% of properties are at or below this equity position among comparable homes.
High-end equity position
100%
90% of properties are at or below this equity position among comparable homes.
Assessment spread
80.3%
Gap between the low-end and high-end equity positions. Higher means assessments look less consistent.
Estimated savings are not guarantees. Actual outcomes depend on property-specific evidence and assessment review decisions.
Is there enough evidence to support a review?
Comparable evidence readiness estimates how much supporting evidence is available in this area for a property-level review. It combines the number of peer equity comps, the number of sales comps, and the quality of the best equity comparable match.
Higher comparable counts and stronger sales scores can make review screening more evidence-ready.
Equity comps
7.9
Average number of similar peer properties available for assessment-equity comparison.
Sales comps
0.4
Average number of comparable sales available for market-value evidence.
Top equity match
56.5%
Average quality score of the best equity comparable match. Higher means the closest peer comps look more similar.
Readiness score
44.5
Combined score: up to 40 points from equity comps, 40 from sales comps, and 20 from top equity match quality.
Estimated savings are not guarantees. Actual outcomes depend on property-specific evidence and assessment review decisions.
Local Home Types With Stronger Signals
This ranks local style and build-era combinations with stronger modeled review signals.
These combinations show stronger local probability, savings, or peer equity signals than other local property types.
Local style and era opportunity
Each card groups homes by architectural style and build era. The opportunity score combines median reduction probability, average estimated savings, median equity position, and historical reduction rate for that group.
COLONIAL
Built 2000 or later
7 properties
Score
78.6
Median reduction probability: 100.0%
Avg. estimated savings: $9,400
CONTEMPORARY
Built 1980-1999
7 properties
Score
78.0
Median reduction probability: 100.0%
Avg. estimated savings: $18,877
CAPE
Built 1960-1979
10 properties
Score
77.1
Median reduction probability: 100.0%
Avg. estimated savings: $15,510
RANCH
Built 1940-1959
7 properties
Score
76.4
Median reduction probability: 100.0%
Avg. estimated savings: $6,276
COLONIAL
Built 1980-1999
7 properties
Score
76.0
Median reduction probability: 99.9%
Avg. estimated savings: $10,163
RANCH
Built 1960-1979
13 properties
Score
75.3
Median reduction probability: 100.0%
Avg. estimated savings: $7,552
COLONIAL
Built 1960-1979
22 properties
Score
75.3
Median reduction probability: 100.0%
Avg. estimated savings: $6,431
OLD STYLE
Built pre-1940
18 properties
Score
72.9
Median reduction probability: 99.8%
Avg. estimated savings: $7,113
COLONIAL
Built pre-1940
7 properties
Score
72.2
Median reduction probability: 99.9%
Avg. estimated savings: $6,473
RAISED RANCH/HI RANC
Built 1960-1979
8 properties
Score
48.4
Median reduction probability: 77.8%
Avg. estimated savings: $1,085
Estimated savings are not guarantees. Actual outcomes depend on property-specific evidence and assessment review decisions.
Have homeowners here recently won reductions?
Historical reductions reflect results from the most recent appeal filing year with finalized outcomes: 2025. These results can show whether reductions have been visible locally, but they do not guarantee any future outcome.
Historical reductions are informational signals and do not determine future review outcomes.
| Properties Reduced | Avg. Assessment Cut | Median Assessment Cut |
|---|---|---|
| 101 | 15.4% | 14.2% |
Estimated savings are not guarantees. Actual outcomes depend on property-specific evidence and assessment review decisions.